Converting Offline Students to Online Students

Shall you convert your offline students to online students? What are the advantages? What are the disadvantages?

I came across this question in a community forum of an online teaching platform. The biggest problem of those platforms seems to be: How to get paying students. Interesting enough most of these platforms have no solution to this problem when asked by their teachers. Au contraire, they ask their teachers how they think to get students on the platform.

And the most discussed issue is: why don’t you simply convert your offline students into online students by bringing them to our platform?

So, here are my thoughts on this.

aboutpixel.de / © Holger Hecklau

aboutpixel.de / © Holger Hecklau

From my perspective the first question is not “Why not?” but “Why should I?”.

  1. I teach online to get more students. If I just convert my existing students I end up with the same number AND I have to pay someone a part of my payment for this (commission between 15% – 18%).
  2. I introduce my student to an environment where I might lose him to another teacher. Basically I bring him out of my save “cave” into an arena of hungry wolves and from this point on I have to fight all the time to keep the student by my side and the other teachers away from him.
  3. Most of the platforms aren’t yet stable enough to offer the same quality as in an offline environment. So why should I offer my long term student a worse service than I offered him before?

I think these are three very strong reasons NOT to bring a student to a teaching PLATFORM. But that does not necessarily mean that you should not convert an offline student to an online student at all.

All you need is a VoIP tool and a virtual classroom environment. So the same features that these platforms offer you for commission. And you know what? Skype, MSN, Yahoo Messenger and virtual classrooms are available for free! So in the end you already save 15% – 18% commission. You can either keep it or offer a part as reduction to your student. You don’t even need a website for this.

Remember: we are talking about students you already teach offline. Getting new students online is a whole different game and for this, online teaching platforms work really well and are worth their commission (most of the time).

Here is the list why you should turn an existing student of your into an online student:

  1. Save money on travel costs (fuel, time on the road).
  2. Online teaching is “weather proof” (no hassle with iced roads in winter time)
  3. Teach more students in the same time (no time on the road, multi student classes)
  4. Offer reductions but still earn more (take your savings on the fuel price and offer 50% as a reduction to the student)
  5. Offer shorter classes = smaller payments = higher frequency (offline classes have a duration of 90 minutes minimum, online classes can start at 30 minutes)

I made good experiences offering an online service to my clients. Most of them still take offline classes but with the possibility of going online they now can take classes during their holidays, when they are not at home or get a spontaneous lesson.

Or they can learn in smaller chunks now, fitting in classes at days that were not possible before which leads to more lessons at the end of the month = more in the teacher’s wallet.

And even with my offered reductions, I earn more at the end of the month! I think this is the real genious of taking your students online. It’s a win-win situation.

Related Posts:

  1. The Learn Now – I am Online Feature
  2. italki opens new Doors for Students
  3. Soon on Myngle: Classes with up to five Students
  4. In the Spotlight: Myngle.com – Learn any Language Online
  5. Make Money Teaching Online

About Kirsten Winkler

Education 2.0 Blogger at KirstenWinkler.com, Interviewer at EDUKWEST.com, Consultant at WinklerMedia.com.
This entry was posted in MMO Make Money Online and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Hi guys,
    thanks for rating this post as relevant :).

    Let me try to write something about all 3 points Mike mentions here. Because I think number one is crucial for platforms like eduFire or Myngle.

    1) As Chris mentions, who of already successful offline teachers is willing to share a part of his payment with an online platform when it cannot offer services that are so great that you are willing to do so.
    Next problem of course who wants to bring his "save" clients into an environment were they might get lost. This is very egoistic of course but still a good reason not to bring those clients online.
    Therefore I don't believe that online platforms will see a growing of their students from this market section unless they offer teachers something interesting that cuts off these two issues.

    2) The only case I can imagine for this is to profit from an offer like Myngle had with their learning boost. Bring your students to Myngle, milk the platform (student profits from low prices, teacher gets paid by Myngke) and then go back to your own website or your offline offers. Interesting for teachers and students, investment without any return for the platform.

    3) There is not really one free website for teaching right now. If you want to "clone" a platform id the combination of free services that are offered in the internet. But you can cut it down to the two things Chris mentions in his comment. VoIP (Skype, MSN, Yahoo Messenger) and "classroom interaction" Google Docs, dabbleboard.com or for a virtual classroom dimdim.com or WiZiQ.com.
    All the rest like own website/blog and an online schedule is icing on the cake and depends on how serious you are about teaching online.

    It became very easy in the last couple of month to get free tools to teach online. The problem is of course to get students. As we are talking here about converting offline to online students we assume that the teacher already has some students. To get new students online is a whole different game and I think this is one of the main reasons to go to a platform like eduFire or Myngle. But this is an other blog post ;).
  • I can't imagine why anybody would want to take a student to an website that takes a cut in their income UNLESS that site if offering something worth having. That might be a really, really good virtual classroom like the Adobe platform used on edufire, or it might be a really effecient booking and payment system that takes the stress out of managing one's own bookings. I don't think such a system exists - what could be easier than asking a client to pay directly into your bank account (if they live locally) or via paypal (if they live abroad)?
    With a little bit of imagination and familiarity with the functionalities of skype and googledocs, for example, an experienced teacher should have no problem offering quality online lessons.
  • chinamike
    Extremely relevant. From the position of the teacher and yes, the on-line provider, I think we need to very extremely clear about the benefits and weaknesses of each approach. Businesses run much better if everyone is in alignment.

    There are at least three categories that need to be investigated:
    1. Teachers who choose not to convert local students to on-line students.
    2. Teachers who convert local students to an on-line website that takes a cut of their income.
    3. Teachers who convert local students to a free website (with the tools they need) and continue to take the full amount.

    I suspect that a great deal could be said about this. Would you agree that groups 2 and 3 need to be better distinguished?
  • I love the picture of the laptop 'notebook' :)

    I think (and hope!) that over time more and more people will become used to the idea of webcams, the internet, etc - online education is a very "young" market right now, just because they are the only people who really know how to utilize the net. Things are changing fast, though; Computers are coming out with built in webcams, the Internet is getting faster, etc etc. Great article, very relevant!
blog comments powered by Disqus