Building an Ecosystem to Support Edu Writers and Content Creators Part 1

The life of creators who try to provide their readers with good and original content is getting harder every day. On the one hand you have content farms like Demand Media, eHow and others cranking out mediocre pieces at rates never seen before, on the other hand readers react more and more allergic to advertisements which have not been a great yet stable way to monetize a blog.

I already wrote a post on the possibility of turning a blog like this one into a freemium model, offering extra content via subscriptions. Though this has worked out pretty well for me personally, it may not be the ideal model for everyone. So, let’s talk about reading flatrates.

There are two ways of supporting writers and content creators: active and passive. In this first post I would like to talk about the active ways.

Of course, the most direct way is a donation but lets be honest, this will only work in very rare cases. I regularly analyze follow the activity on blogs in education with a donation button but also the most influential tech blogs and generally spoken people don’t seem to care a great deal for the donation options. If techcrunch, a blog with around 1.5 million page views and a little less than 150.000 fans on Facebook, manages to attract a mere 80 people to donate less than $8000 for a cause prominently positioned on its main page, it says a lot. Same is true for Wikipedia with only 0.12% of unique monthly visitors who donated to get the needed $16 million, largely given my wealthy philanthropists according to the statistics. Let’s not even start with my own blog, you can have a look at it yourselves. Long story short, it blows my mind!  Croudfunding like kickstarter however seems to work in cases where donators have the potential opportunity to hold the product funded in their own hands one day. Let’s boil it down to the essence of paying for something that exists already versus investing in something you might own at some point in the future.
The second option is clicking on advertisements on the site which is actually problematic as Google might count this as click fraud if your readers did it every day, so it’s a very thin line.
Third option was something like affiliate links, the reader sees a product placement from Amazon, maybe a book he or she would like to buy anyway, and then buys it via the affiliate link.

All of the above are possibilities but far from being perfect and suitable for every writer and content creator.

Active Support: flattr

One of the first startups that built a service for content creators to help them generate revenue from their readers besides the classic models of advertisements or sponsorships are the guys from flattr.

flattr is a wordplay from “to flatter” and “flatrate”. Consumers of content, e.g. readers of a blog, viewers of a webcast, listeners of music, … pay a small monthly fee to their flattr account. The amount can be chosen by the consumer, may it be 2 Euro or 10 Euro or more.

Creators of content, e.g. bloggers, video creators, musicians, … can embed a small flattr widget next to their content similar to the Tweet or Facebook Share buttons. If a consumer likes the content, he or she can click on the flattr widget and therefore pay the content creator.

At the end of the month each content creator who received a flattr will get his / her “piece of the pie”. If a consumer “flattred” 10 creators, each of them gets a 10th of the monthly fee the consumer wants to spend, e.g. if the consumer wants to spend 2 Euro each creator will get 0.20 Euro or if it’s 10 Euro then every creator will be paid 1 Euro.

flattr is already quite popular in the German blogger scene and as author André Klein pointed out in the Edupreneurs Club on Facebook, it seems as if there existed a certain range of topics flattr works best for. In Germany’s case it’s politics and culture. I think, what we see is an ecosystem that evolved around a certain circle of blogs that use flattr and a readership that overlaps, e.g. readers who consume content from several blogs within this circle.

You don’t join flattr as a reader for just one blog. In that case you could make a donation directly to this particular blogger. But as soon as the most part of the blogs that are of interest to this group of readers offer such a widget it makes sense and becomes a standard.

To make this work for education we needed to team up and make the flattr button a standard on all blogs and content websites in our space. I could imagine that working pretty well in the circle of lesson material creators for example. If the teachers who download the lesson plans from various sources could flattr all of the content creators it might become an important source of income. But, as I said, the clear majority of those resource sites needed to take part in that in order to make it work.

The other problem I see is the “active” part in flattr. Although it may not seem such a big thing, pushing a mouse button can be very hard for consumers. If your readers don’t even have the time to share your blog post or lesson plan with their network on Twitter or Facebook by clicking on the widget, why should it work with flattr? It’s a constant struggle to get people out of their comfort zone equaling passivity.

In the second post, I will write about passive methods of support. Meanwhile, I would alike to hear your ideas and exchange views. Is flattr an option for your blog, or even better, an option for a group of bloggers and websites you know about?

Related Links:

  1. flattr

 

If you enjoyed this post, subscribe to the free EDUKWEST Newsletter and get updates via email.

With the subscription to the EDUKWEST Newsletter you will get
  • early access to upcoming interviews
  • news updates and reports
  • job listings in education 2.0
  • other exclusive perks

Your Email Address:

We respect your privacy and hate spam as much as you do. EDUKWEST will never sell, reveal or trade your email address.

  • Pingback: Kirsten Winkler

  • Pingback: George Machlan

  • Pingback: Hoon

  • Pingback: Jim Meeker

  • Pingback: dimi gineva

  • http://www.facebook.com/gmachlan Louis George Machlan

    Item 1 Thanks for the pic. One day we should talk about why I think pics in any blog posting is a holistic approach to the reader. Not just A.D.D. types like me but also for the more left brain dominant readers you primarily serve. Active steps, like content supporting pictures, is a whole brain invitation to the reader and a whole brain engagement of the material tendered.

    Item #2 Great intro. A little verbose for my attention span but a good primer for you series. You might consider using some formatting features to make the main points stand out, if you cared as I am sure that your normal readership is more linear and able to follow better then a superficial American like me.

    Item #3 Flatr… as we have discussed previously, I am particularly interested in this financial model for a learning portal foundation. I am not able to fully verbalize my interest in how it would apply to our specific future at The Edupunk, because we really don't know exactly where we are going. Your introduction of this application particularly has helped me formulate a holistic concept of how a free market mindset could be used for rewarding “good” behavior and offerings of our user community. I still think that their cut (share of monies collected) is rather high. This might mean that we would need to create our own “in house” bank to minimize the lost revenues. We shall see.

    Item #4 As you know, I do not like to write much. I much prefer to engage in a live discussion or perhaps a live event for sharing and delving into the meat of topics such as these. When are you going to switch to Vokle or some such panel type format for engaging these topics of yours? You have the “presence” and talents for an Oprahesque (sp?) show. Andre and others have the expertise to advise you. And I have the brash American B.S. (original base meaning) to engage you. C'mon let's take this format of yours to the next level!

    • http://kirstenwinkler.com KirstenWinkler

      It's not so much about the how to develop and run such a system like flattr or any other online payment / donation app, although this is already tricky enough, but about the legal implications as you need to work with authorities that regulate the banking sector. Not sure if that's worth it, maybe on a bigger scale but in this case you could negotiate the fees again.

      If you are planning to build something on your own it still should be based on a already existing payment system like PayPal to avoid all the other stuff.

      There will be more webinars in 2011, no worries. And if I shall turn into Oprah, someone please shoot me :) . She is a very smart lady and a media mogul, however …

  • audreywatters

    I installed flattr on my blogs at the beginning of the year, and I've been very pleased. I also run google adsense on my RSS feeds, and even though, as you note, the flattr community is small, I'd say I've earned about the same amount from flattr as I have from ads. OK, it's a whopping $14 or so, but still. :)

    But your larger point is an important one, and something I think about a lot — how to monetize the work we do without really selling out our sites to flashing ads and sponsors.

    • http://kirstenwinkler.com KirstenWinkler

      $14 are three coffees, essential for bloggers ;) It's great to hear that it also works outside of Germany and I think if we can manage to get more edu bloggers on board this could actually become something decent. I think I'll give it a go and install flattr.

      I think sponsors, if picked carefully of course, are a good alternative to ads etc. and I am looking into that direction for EDUKWEST, KWestions etc. If the videos perform well then written content can stay ad free. We'll see.

      Btw, thanks for stopping by. I'm a big fan of your work on RWW and Hackeducation!

      • audreywatters

        I've been thinking about this more and more. I just added Readability to Hack Education. And now I'm debating running a Kickstarter campaign that's, like, “Hey pay for Audrey to be your ed-tech journalist.” :)

        • http://kirstenwinkler.com KirstenWinkler

          Guess what part 2 will be about ;) . Readability is an interesting option as it's passive and through the new collaboration with Instapaper it could get some traction.

  • Pingback: Kirsten Winkler

  • Pingback: Kirsten Winkler

  • Pingback: E-Teachers Academy